雅思写作动物类话题

对于这种级别的雅思写作范文，大家可以学习的地方很多，行文结构，观点句表达，用词，行文过渡方法。这篇关于雅思写作动物类话题，希望对你们有帮助。

雅思写作动物类话题

题目：Some people think zoos are cruel and the zoos should be closed. However, some people think zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

首先，我们可以确认这个题目的题型是议论文，包含两类人对动物园是否应该关闭有不同看法。所以两方的观点都要写，否则违背"address all parts of the task".

赞成动物园应该关闭的观点

1.动物园应该关闭因为它破坏了生态平衡。

2.动物园应该关闭因为它限制了动物的自由。

3.动物园应该关闭因为它导致动物们失去生活本能。

赞成动物园有用的观点

1.动物园是休闲娱乐的好去处，缓解压力。

2.动物园保护濒危动物不被偷猎。

3.动物园提高人们保护濒危动物的意识

认真审题的同学们一定注意到了题目中的表达zoos are cruel and the zoos should be closed,意思是动物园应该被关闭是指对动物是残忍的，所以赞成动物园应该关闭的理由中观点1 不符合要求，与环境无关。

另外题目中另一些人认为zoos can protect the rare animals ,对象是rare animals,与它无关的都算走题。因此赞成动物园有用的观点中的第一个也不扣题。

最后符合题目的观点应该是

1.agree to close the zoo

1)The zoo restricts the freedom of animals.

2)Animals are forced to change their instincts in the zoo.

2.agree that the zoo protects the rare animals

1) Zoos prevent rare animals from being poached

2) Zoos play a role in raising people's awareness to protect wild animals.

雅思写作语料动物实验合理

Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicines intended for human use. Others, however, think it is not right to do that. Discuss both of these views and give you own opinion. 有人认为小动物实验对于人类有益，有认为人们没有权利用动物实验，讨论两种观点，给出你的意见?

思路拓展：

反对小动物实验：

1. 生命是平等的，不该伤害小动物;小动物的基本生存权利不可被剥夺。

2. 从道德角度看是不对的;小动物实验不道德，很残忍。

3. 小动物实验如果合法化，这种权利可能会被滥用。

支持小动物实验：

1. 科学家把科技的进步归结给为实验做出了巨大贡献的小动物们;因为用动物实验便于观察小动物，小动物在一些方面和人类是有共性的。

2. 小动物实验减少了临床实验的可能，对于新药的研发推广有重要的意义;(药品;化妆品;化学产品)

语料库：

1. Animal experimentation will enable people to know more about themselves, for there are many similarities between human race and animals. Therefore, the results of scientific research can help people to get further knowledge about mankind. 实验的结果可以帮助人们更多的了解人类。

2. Every year, a great many animals undergo painful suffering or death because of scientific research into the effects of drugs, food additives and other chemical products. 每一年，由于研发药品，化妆品和其他的化学产品，很多小动物经历了痛苦和死亡。

3. Scientists owe medical advances to the animals which make substantial contributions to the experiment. 科学家把医疗的进步归结给为实验做出了巨大贡献的小动物们。

4. minimize the frequency of clinic experimentation v 减少了临床实验的频率。

5. Virtually, animal experiment is an abuse of animal life and an obvious violation of the basic right of subsistence. 实际上，动物实验是对动物的生命的践踏，是对动物的基本生存权利的公然侵犯。

6. Consequently, animal experiment is immoral and an act of cruelty. 因此小动物实验是不道德的，是一种残忍的行为。

7. A heated debate springs up as to whether or not animal experimentation should be conducted. 人们就是否应该进行动物实验展开了激烈的争论。

8. I cannot accept the fact that many pitiful animals are used in finding cure for some infectious diseases. 我不能接受无数可怜动物被用来找寻传染病的治疗方法。

9. Animal should receive better care and treatment. 动物应该得到更好的照顾和待遇。

10. Human scientific research, in which animals are subjected to various experiments should be also condemned. 人类的科学研究拿动物来进行各种实验，这一点应该受到谴责。

雅思大作文范文动物实验利弊

It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.

On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.

On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.

In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.