外语培训网,让考试变简单,让口语更流利!

位置:外语培训网 > 英语学习网 > 雅思学习资讯 >

雅思写作逻辑性提高

资料整理:广州英语学校发布时间:2018-05-1953

雅思写作逻辑性提高

雅思写作逻辑性提高。很多考生都不懂得雅思写作的逻辑性是什么,下面是小编整理的相关文章,希望能帮到你!

雅思写作—逻辑问题

1、分段结构混乱

对于雅思写作来说,其实没有太固定的结构,也不存在官方统一的分段模式。没有作文一定要写成一边倒,或者一定要写让步结构。但是,一篇作文必须按其条理性有明确和清晰的分段,也就是有层次感。当然,每个考生比较好有自己固定的分段思路。这样以便于作文的分类与准备练习。分段结构混乱通常体现在烤鸭们很容易把没有逻辑关系的内容放成了一段,或者说同一个内容放在很多段里面论述,没有进行很好的归纳。剑桥7Test2就是一个很好的例子,考的是固定惩罚还是量刑比较好。印象很深刻的是书后给了一篇7.5分的范文,整篇文章分了7段式,同一个内容放在了好几段来论述。在范文评分标准的分析里面就有提到,结构混乱是这篇作文的一个很大的缺陷。可见,分段的合理性也是作文得分的一个重要而又基础的部分,考生写作时还是要稍加注意,不能太随意。

2、中心论点展开缺乏逻辑性

很多同学的基础都特别好,句子与词汇表达都相对比较不错,但是写作却一直上不了6分。逻辑对于雅思写作是6分分水岭的一个坎。因为词汇语法到位只能铸就单一的散句,并不能表达统一连贯的意义。很多学生在写作文时,想到哪就写到哪,完全没有考虑过逻辑这一问题。前后上下之间没有太多的内在联系,甚至有些部分毫不沾边,无法成段。

大作文其实逻辑关系并不复杂,递进,因果,对比,举例,转折等几种应该是用得最多的。逻辑把握不好就很难提分,也很容易导致发挥不稳定。虽然提高逻辑能力有一定的难度,并不是几天时间就能克服这个障碍的,但最有效的方法就是在平时的写作过程中,建议考生在下笔前先想想即将要写的句子和上下文之间属于哪种逻辑关系,并且每个句子之间是否存在逻辑关系,不要一味想着快速完成。最后,除了要注意所写内容在语意上的逻辑性之外,还要注意连接词的正确使用,不能误把转折词理解成了并列结构,把递进结构词用成了举例结构,这些逻辑方面的常犯错误要引起重视。

雅思写作之什么是逻辑

逻辑一词是严复从英文“Logic”一词音译过来的。在汉语中逻辑有四种含义:

1、事物发展的客观规律性。“捣乱,失败,再捣乱,再失败,直至灭亡,这就是帝国主义和世界上的一切反动派对待人民事业的逻辑,……斗争,失败,再斗争,直至胜利,这就是人民的逻辑。”

2、指某种观点和主张。“你有你的逻辑,我有我的逻辑。”

3、思维的形式和规律性。“张三的讲话逻辑性太差。”“李四的文章逻辑性很强。”

4、研究思维的科学——逻辑学。逻辑学是关于思维形式及其规律的科学。在联合国教科文组织编制的学科分类中,逻辑学被列为7大基础学科的第2位;英国大百科全书把逻辑学列为五大学科的首位。逻辑学包括形式逻辑、辩证逻辑和数理逻辑等等。

雅思写作如何构造逻辑性论点

Constructing a Logical Argument

Introduction:

There is a great deal of argument on Usenet. Unfortunately, most of it is of very poor quality. This document attempts to provide a gentle introduction to logic, in the hope of improving the general level of debate.

Logic is the science of reasoning, proof, thinking, or inference [Concise OED]. Logic allows us to analyse a piece of reasoning, and determine whether it is correct or not. To use the technical terms, we determine whether the reasoning is valid or invalid.

One does not need to study logic in order to reason correctly. However, a little basic knowledge of logic is often helpful when constructing or analyzing an argument.

Note that I am not claiming that logic is universally applicable. That issue is very much open to debate. This document only explains how to use logic; you must decide whether logic is the right tool for the job.

Note also that this document deals only with simple boolean logic. Other sorts of mathematical logic, such as fuzzy logic, obey different rules. When people talk of logical arguments, though, they generally mean the type being described here.

Basic concepts:

The building blocks of a logical argument are propositions, also called statements. A proposition is a statement which is either true or false; for example:

"The first programmable computer was built in Cambridge."

"Dogs cannot see colour."

"Berlin is the capital of Germany."

Propositions may be either asserted (said to be true) or denied (said to be false). Note that this is a technical meaning of "deny", not the everyday meaning.

The proposition is the meaning of the statement, not the particular arrangement of words used. So "A God exists" and "There exists a God" both express the same proposition.

What is an argument?

An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition". There are three stages to an argument: Premises, inference, and conclusion.

Stage one: Premises

One or more propositions will be are necessary for the argument to continue. They must be stated explicitly. They are called the premises of the argument. They are the evidence (or reasons) for accepting the argument and its conclusions.

Premises (or assertions) are often indicated by phrases such as "because", "since", "obviously" and so on.

(The phrase "obviously" is often viewed with suspicion, as it can be used to intimidate others into accepting dubious premises. If something doesn't seem obvious to you, don't be afraid to question it. You can always say "Oh, yes, you're right, it is obvious" when you've heard the explanation.)

Stage two: Inference

The premises of the argument are used to obtain further propositions. This process is known as inference. In inference, we start with one or more propositions which have been accepted. We then derive a new proposition. There are various forms of valid inference.

The propositions arrived at by inference may then be used in further inference. Inference is often denoted by phrases such as "implies that" or "therefore".

Stage three: Conclusion

Finally, we arrive at the conclusion of the argument, another proposition. The conclusion is often stated as the final stage of inference. It is affirmed on the basis the original premises, and the inference from them. Conclusions are often indicated by phrases such as "therefore", "it follows that", "we conclude" and so on.

Types of argument

There are two traditional types of argument, deductive and inductive. A deductive argument provides conclusive proof of its conclusions; if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. A deductive argument is either valid or invalid.

A valid argument is defined as one where if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true.

An inductive argument is one where the premises provide some evidence for the truth of the conclusion. Inductive arguments are not valid or invalid, but we can talk about whether they are better or worse than other arguments. We can also discuss how probable their premises are.

There are forms of argument in ordinary language which are neither deductive nor inductive. However, this document concentrates on deductive arguments, as they are often viewed as the most rigorous and convincing.

Here is an example of a deductive argument:

Every event has a cause (premise)

The universe has a beginning (premise)

All beginnings involve an event (premise)

This implies that the beginning of the universe involved an event (inference)

Therefore the universe has a cause (inference and conclusion)

Note that the conclusion of one argument might be a premise in another argument. A proposition can only be called a premise or a conclusion with respect to a particular argument; the terms do not make sense in isolation.

以上就是为考生们整理的有关雅思写作如何构造逻辑性论点内容,考生们可以取其精华,运用在自己的写作中,小编在此提醒考生们,必须要全面正确地理解好题意,才能循题目的思路展开中肯的议论,否则南辕北辙,文不对题,顾左右而言他,必然失分。

可增强逻辑性的雅思作文链接词

雅思作文链接词1、层次词汇/并列关系词汇(这组词汇用在小作文时主要是在流程里可能用到, 而大作文里则用的更为常见)

首先,其次, 然后, 最后: firstly, secondly, thirdly; in the first place, in the second place, in the final place; first and foremost, moreover, additionally, furthermore, eventually, last but by no means least; to start with, to end with, on top of that, in addition to that, added to that, besides, finally, lastly.

雅思作文链接词2、表转折关系

However, otherwise, nevertheless, instead, notwithstanding

In contrast, by contrast, on the contrary, despite the fact that, in spite of

But, yet, although, even though, though

雅思作文链接词3、表强调

Of course, indeed, most important, certainly, in fact, obviously, clearly, surely, in particular, in this case, actually.

雅思作文链接词4、表比较

In comparison, likewise, similarly, equally, in the same way, identically

雅思作文链接词5、表递进

Furthermore, moreover, besides, in addition, additionally, also.

雅思作文链接词6、表因果

原因 because of, owing to, due to, thanks to.(介词类)

Because, since, for, as(连词类)

结果 therefore, thus, hence, consequently, accordingly(副此类)

As a result, as a consequence(介词类)

So(连词 不够正式 少用为好)

以上就是为大家整理的可增强逻辑性的雅思作文链接词,最后,祝大家在雅思考试中取得好成绩!

广州勤学教育信息技术有限公司©版权所有 粤ICP备10236336号-4更新时间:2022-11-03